Sensitive underwriting data deserves deliberate boundaries.

Cevrynt is designed around scoped access, controlled data handling, traceable activity, and lender-defined retention requirements — so security can be agreed around the underwriting workflow before production use.

Illustrative Cevrynt underwriting workspace showing business verification, cash-flow analysis, fraud review, and underwriting status
01

DEAL-SCOPED ACCESS

Give the review the deal — not the whole book.

Cevrynt can scope an underwriting review around the borrower package and records required for that case. Unrelated deals, borrowers, and historical files do not need to become part of the review just because they exist in the same organization.

143pages in approved deal scope

0unrelated pages included

  1. Business applicationpp. 1–66 pages
  2. Bank statementspp. 7–126120 pages
  3. Owner identitypp. 127–1282 pages
  4. Bank proofpp. 1291 page
  5. Existing MCA agreementpp. 130–14314 pages
One mark per page · the review scope is the approved deal package
02

Review activity

If something changes on a deal, the record should show who changed it and why.

Cevrynt keeps material review activity attached to the same underwriting record — findings raised, evidence reviewed, policy exceptions handled, corrections made, and reviewer actions recorded with their timing and context.

Underwriter14:31 UTC

Underwriting memo prepared

Updated findings, supporting evidence, policy outcomes, and reviewer rationale were assembled into the same deal record for final review.

06material events recorded

00policy exception raised

00reviewer override recorded

Material review actions stay attached to the underwriting record so a later reviewer can see what happened, when it happened, and who took the action.

03

RETENTION & DELETION

Not every part of an underwriting file needs the same clock.

Cevrynt separates source documents, derived underwriting data, review activity, and operational logs so retention can be defined around the purpose of each data type — rather than applying one blanket period to everything.

  1. 01unset

    Borrower source files

    Bank statements, applications, identity evidence, agreements, and other documents submitted for the underwriting review.

    Retention defined for the approved underwriting workflow

  2. 02unset

    Underwriting record

    Structured values, analysis results, verification findings, policy outcomes, exceptions, and memo content derived from the deal.

    Retention defined around review, audit, and business requirements

  3. 03unset

    Review activity

    Material reviewer actions such as exceptions opened, overrides recorded, corrections made, and review-state changes.

    Retained according to the audit history your organization needs

    Usually unnamed in a review

  4. 04unset

    Operational & security logs

    Authentication events, errors, access-control events, processing status, and technical telemetry used to operate and secure the service.

    Retention defined separately from borrower-file data

    Usually unnamed in a review

Retention is defined by data type, not by one blanket clock. Source files, underwriting records, review activity, and operational logs can each follow the retention and deletion requirements agreed for the workflow.
04

DATA CUSTODY & PROCESSING

Every system that can process the file should be accounted for.

A production Cevrynt workflow should make the processing path clear: what borrower data enters, which approved service layers may handle it, why each one needs access, and where responsibility sits.

Chain of custody

APP-240819-017 · illustrative

No.In whose handsWhat they holdHow they are named
01Your intake & systemsThe borrower data, files, and deal information your team chooses to send into the underwriting workflow.Your approved source
02Cevrynt applicationDeal organization, structured underwriting data, findings, policy results, reviewer actions, and workflow state.Cevrynt processing scope
03Infrastructure servicesStorage, compute, database, queue, and delivery functions required to operate the approved environment.Approved infrastructure providers
04AI & document-processing servicesOnly the content required for the extraction, analysis, or verification task those services are used to perform.Approved processing providers
05No fifth holderProvider changes follow review

The processing chain can change as the production architecture evolves. Any new provider that may handle borrower data should be reviewed under the applicable security, contractual, and change-management process before it becomes part of the approved workflow.

04processing layers documented

00unreviewed providers

03left open on purpose — each closes with your team, not on this page

  1. Which providers may process borrower data?

    Documented for the approved production architecture

  2. What data does each provider actually receive?

    Scoped to the function that provider performs

  3. Where is borrower data stored and processed?

    Reviewed against agreed deployment and data-handling requirements

05

FOUNDER-LED SECURITY REVIEW

Bring your security requirements.

Walk through your questionnaire, access model, retention rules, data-processing requirements, audit expectations, and deployment constraints directly with the team responsible for the product.